I have not read this book, but I noticed an error in the "blurb" above: it incorrectly asserts that 420,000 British soldiers died on the first day of the Battle of the Somme (a number greater than all American soldiers who died during the Vietnam War). As a matter of fact, official tallies suggest only 19,240 killed the first day of the battle, with total casualties (wounded and dead combined) around 350,000. Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_day_on_the_Somme#Aftermath , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Somme#Casualties
Here's the catch: for anyone who has not read a background on the war, this is not the one to read, because it is so dense with detail and the conclusions so controversial it's not fair to read just it; for anyone who has read about the war you can skip to the last chapter where the controversial conclusion lies, not having read 95% of the book.
The conclusion is intriguing that Germany began a continental war for whatever reason, and Britain made it into a world war by entering on the side of France, which on its own would have lost. That's not much fun, since the preceding information does not explain very well what was going on in the Germanic mind in the years leading up, so we don't really learn how the war came about except for the usual discussions of the naval race and faulty diplomacy. For a clearer analysis read Margaret MacMillan's "The War That Ended Peace," a brilliant and more readable work.
One nutty part is where he says one reason the war went on was that soldiers actually liked fighting. Another is where Ferguson projects that Germany would have created a European Union 80 years ahead of when it actually came about, and there would be the British Empire more or less intact. Keep in mind that comes from a scholar whose most recent work finds the British Empire the best way to run the world.
There are no ages for this title yet.
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.
There are no quotes for this title yet.